If you have a notebook with a PCIe Gen 3x4 interface that supports an M.2 x 2280 SSD and you are looking to upgrade, OCZ's RD400 is an excellent choice because it is not only powerful, it is also power efficient.
#Ocz revodrive 400 nvme ssd alaunch driver#
Additionally, OCZ's proprietary driver supports Windows 7 and can be F6 loaded with your Windows 7 install, making it easy for Windows 7 users to run the RD400 as their OS disk. The RD400 will run fine with Microsoft's in-box NVMe driver, but even better with OCZ's NVMe driver. OCZ enhances reliability and performance even further with its proprietary NVMe driver. QSBC is rumored to be even more efficient than LDPC. To address this, the RD400 employs Toshiba's proprietary Quadruple Swing-By Code (QSBC) error-correction technology, a highly efficient error correction code (ECC), which helps protect customer data from corruption, improves reliability, and extends the life of Toshiba SSDs.
Reliability and endurance are essential to any high-performance SSD solution. Utilizing planar flash is the reason why OCZ's RD400 costs less per gigabyte than Samsung's 950 Pro. The RD400 employs a Toshiba 15nm MLC planar flash array. Contrary to popular belief, NVMe in not a physical interface, it is a software stack that runs on the PCIe interface. The RD400 is an M.2 form factor SSD with a PCIe Gen 3x4 physical interface, which we find most appealing. OCZ's RD400 is their first stab at a consumer-based NVMe SSD. Today, OCZ introduces the world to the RD400. Both of our assumptions turned out to be correct. We speculated that OCZ's RevoDrive 400, or RD400, as we will refer to it going forward, was about to launch and that the RD400 would likely deliver even better performance than the XG3. In our XG3 review, we mentioned that a retail version was coming soon via OCZ's RevoDrive 400. In addition, the XG3 handily outperformed Intel's 750 series SSDs with real-world performance testing. Toshiba's XG3 stunned us with its superior sequential and random write performance, which turned out to be far better than Samsung's M.2 NVMe offerings. Toshiba's OEM XG3 lit up our charts and cemented itself as the second best performing non-enterprise client (OEM) SSD that we've ever tested.
#Ocz revodrive 400 nvme ssd alaunch pro#
Lastly, the 950 Pro comes in a far more appealing M.2 form factor.Ī couple of weeks ago, we got the chance to review Toshiba's XG3 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD. Pricing is the next reason for the 950 Pro's success with an MSRP of $349.99 for the 512GB model, Samsung's 950 Pro costs considerably less per gigabyte than Intel's 750 series SSDs.
Number one is, of course, better performance, which is usually first on an enthusiast's check list. Several factors make the 950 Pro more appealing to hardcore enthusiasts than Intel's 750 Series SSDs.
0 kommentar(er)
